More Ideological Litigation
Bruce Hotze, spear carrier for the anti-Proposition G crowd from a couple of years ago, has suffered yet another setback. His quasi-Libertarian attempt to shoot down Prop G in the courts was denied.
Prop G made a lot of sense by its exclusion of "enterprise funds" (i.e., airport, convention center) revenue from rollover into the city's general fund when it exceeds the cap set by Proposition 2.
I'm as worried about governmental bloat as the next taxpayer - maybe more so - but voted in favor of Prop G since the revenues it affected were not tied to property tax rates (always a sore spot). At the time, there was concern that Prop G amounted to a subsidizing of airlines but so far there aren't any signs of that. The ongoing construction at IAH speaks of growth of the infrastructure rather than Continental's bottom line.
While I respect Hotze's interest in good government, using the court system in an attempt to enforce his view of it seems misplaced. It also smacks of the same kind of manipulation that the far right/left uses when commissioners, FEMA directors and tort reform, for example, are ensconced because of political fealty rather than basic competence or being good for all as opposed to some.